So despite all the rhetoric, the difference is only in the first 3 years of an agreement. If the average NHL gate is $1.5 million (I'm just guessing) then the difference between the two is the equivalent of 200 league games or about 16% of a season's schedule. So if the season is shorter than 75 games, then each side stands to lose $150 million based on a 50:50 split. If the season is shortened to 68 games then each side Will lose as much as they could possible gain in this dispute.
This suggests that all those games cancelled by the league could likely be restored once the parties settle and that a settlement is likely soon. In the end the owners are not going to give up revenue for a moral victory. I think in this standoff the players can actually win.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | |||
Revenue | $ 3,300 | $ 3,330 | $ 3,570 | $ 3,827 | $ 4,102 | $ 4,398 | $ 4,714 | |
Players' share (NHL's offer) | $ 1,881 | $ 1,650 | $ 1,785 | $ 1,913 | $ 2,051 | $ 2,199 | $ 2,357 | |
Players' share (NHLPA's offer) | $ 1,881 | $ 1,832 | $ 1,892 | $ 1,952 | $ 2,051 | $ 2,199 | ||
Diference | $ 182 | $ 107 | $ 38 | $ - | $ - | $ 327 | ||
* All figures in $1,000,000 | ||||||||
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar